Jump to content

Common Era

From Wikipedia

Template:Short description Template:Redirect Template:Use dmy dates Common Era (CE) and Before the Common Era (BCE) are year notations for the Gregorian or Julian calendar, and are exactly equivalent to the Anno Domini (AD) and Before Christ (BC) notations. The expressions "2026 CE" and "AD 2026" each equally describe the current year; "400 BCE" and "400 BC" are the same year too.[1][2] BCE/CE are primarily used to avoid religious connotations,[3] by not referring to Jesus as Template:Lang ('Lord').[4][5]Template:Efn

History

Anno Domini

Around the year 525, the Christian monk Dionysius Exiguus devised the principle of taking the moment that he believed to be the date of the incarnation of Jesus to be the point from which years are numbered (the epoch) of the Christian ecclesiastical calendar.[6][7][8] Dionysius labeled the column of the table in which he introduced the new era as "Template:Lang" ('the years of our Lord Jesus Christ').[6]Template:Rp He did this to replace the Era of the Martyrs system (then used for some Easter tables) because he did not wish to continue the memory of a tyrant who persecuted Christians.[6]Template:Rp

This way of numbering years became more widespread in Europe, with Bede using it in England in 731. Bede also introduced the practice of dating years before 1 backwards without a year zeroTemplate:Efn though the name "BC" for this era did not happen until much later.Template:When

Vulgar Era

Template:Wikt

File:JKepler.jpg
Johannes Kepler (1571Template:Ndash1630), the German astronomer, mathematician, astrologer, natural philosopher and writer on music[9]

The first use of the Latin term Template:LangTemplate:Efn may be in a 1615 book by Johannes Kepler.[10][11] Kepler's intent was to distinguish the Anno Domini era, which was in popular use, from the dates of the German regnal year—i.e., the year of the reign of a sovereign—typically used in national law.[12] The word "vulgar" originally meant "of the ordinary people", with no derogatory associations.[13] Kepler used it again, as Template:Lang, in a 1616 table of ephemerides,[14] as well as in 1617 (albeit as Template:Lang).[15] An English-language 1635 edition of that book, in its title page, may contain the earliest known use of "Vulgar Era".[16]Template:Efn A 1701 book edited by John le Clerc includes the phrase "Before Christ according to the Vulgar Æra,Template:Nbsp6".[17]

The Merriam-Webster Dictionary gives 1716 as the date of first use of the term "vulgar era" (which it defines as "Christian era").[18]Template:Efn

Common Era

The English phrase "Common Era" appears at least as early as 1708,[19] and in a 1715 book on astronomy, it is used interchangeably with "Christian Era" and "Vulgar Era".[20] A 1759 history book uses common æra in a generic sense to refer to "the common era of the Jews".[21] The phrase "before the common era" may have first appeared in a 1770 work that also uses common era and vulgar era as synonyms in a translation of a book originally written in German.[22] The 1797 edition of the Encyclopædia Britannica uses the terms vulgar era and common era synonymously.[23][24] In 1835, in his book Living Oracles, Alexander Campbell wrote: "The vulgar Era, or Anno Domini; the fourth year of Jesus Christ, the first of which was but eight days".[25] He refers to the common era as a synonym for vulgar era: "the fact that our Lord was born on the 4th year before the vulgar era, called Anno Domini, thus making (for example) the 42d year from his birth to correspond with the 38th of the common era".[26] The Catholic Encyclopedia (1909), in at least one article, reports all three terms (Christian, Vulgar, Common Era) being commonly understood by the early 20th century.[27]

The phrase "common era", in lower case, also appeared in the 19th century in a "generic" sense, not necessarily to refer to the Christian Era, but to any system of dates in everyday use throughout a civilization. Thus, "the common era of the Jews",[28][29] "the common era of the Mahometans",[30] "common era of the world",[31] or "the common era of the foundation of Rome".[32] When it did refer to the Christian Era, it was sometimes qualified (e.g., "common era of the Incarnation",[33] "common era of the Nativity",[34] or "common era of the birth of Christ").[35]

An adapted translation of Common Era into Latin as Template:LangTemplate:Efn was adopted in the 20th century by some followers of Aleister Crowley, and thus the abbreviation "e.v." or "EV" may sometimes be seen as a replacement for AD.[36]

Judaism

Although Jews have the Hebrew calendar, they often use the Gregorian calendar without the AD prefix, as Judaism does not recognize Jesus as the Messiah.[37] As early as 1825, the abbreviation VE (for Vulgar Era) was in use among Jews to denote years in the Western calendar.[38] Common Era has been in use for Hebrew lessons since before 1905.[39] Jews have also used the term Current Era.[40]

Contemporary usage

Some academics in the fields of theology, education, archaeology and history have adopted CE and BCE notation despite some disagreement.[41] A study conducted in 2014 found that the BCE/CE notation is not growing at the expense of BC and AD notation in the scholarly literature, and that both notations are used in a relatively stable fashion.[42]

Australia

In 2011, media reports suggested that the BC/AD notation in Australian school textbooks would be replaced by BCE/CE notation.[43] The change drew opposition from some politicians and church leaders. Weeks after the story broke, the Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority denied the rumours and stated that the BC/AD notation would remain, with CE and BCE as an optional suggested learning activity.[44]

Canada

In 2013, the Canadian Museum of Civilization (now the Canadian Museum of History) in Gatineau (opposite Ottawa), which had previously switched to BCE/CE, decided to change back to BC/AD in material intended for the public while retaining BCE/CE in academic content.[45]

Nepal

The notation is in particularly common use in Nepal in order to disambiguate dates from the local (Indian or Hindu) calendar, Bikram or Vikram Sambat. Disambiguation is needed because the era of the Hindu calendar is quite close to the Common Era.

United Kingdom

In 2002, an advisory panel for the religious education syllabus for England and Wales recommended introducing BCE/CE dates to schools,[46] and by 2018 some local education authorities were using them.[47]

In 2018, the National Trust said it would continue to use BC/AD as its house style.[47] English Heritage explains its era policy thus: "It might seem strange to use a Christian calendar system when referring to British prehistory, but the BC/AD labels are widely used and understood."[48] Some parts of the BBC use BCE/CE, but some presenters have said they will not.[47] As of October 2019, the BBC News style guide has entries for AD and BC, but not for CE or BCE.[49] The style guide for The Guardian says, under the entry for CE/BCE: "some people prefer CE (common era, current era, or Christian era) and BCE (before common era, etc.) to AD and BC, which, however, remain our style".[50]

United States

In the United States, the use of the BCE/CE notation in textbooks was reported in 2005 to be growing.[39] Some publications have transitioned to using it exclusively. For example, the 2007 World Almanac was the first edition to switch to BCE/CE, ending a period of 138 years in which the traditional BC/AD dating notation was used. BCE/CE is used by the College Board in its history tests,[51] and by the Norton Anthology of English Literature. Others have taken a different approach. The US-based History Channel uses BCE/CE notation in articles on non-Christian religious topics such as Jerusalem and Judaism.[52] The 2006 style guide for the Episcopal Diocese Maryland Church News says that BCE and CE should be used.[53] The US-based Society of Biblical Literature style guide for academic texts on religion prefers BCE/CE to BC/AD.[54]

In June 2006, in the United States, the Kentucky State School Board reversed its decision to use BCE and CE in the state's new Program of Studies, leaving education of students about these concepts a matter of local discretion.[55][56][57]

Rationales

Support

The use of CE in Jewish scholarship was historically motivated by the desire to avoid the implicit "Our Lord" in the abbreviation AD.Template:Efn Although other aspects of dating systems are based in Christian origins, AD is a direct reference to Jesus as Lord.[58][59][60] Proponents of the Common Era notation assert that the use of BCE/CE shows sensitivity to those who use the same year numbering system as the one that originated with and is currently used by Christians, but who are not themselves Christian.[61] Former Secretary-General of the United Nations Kofi Annan has argued:[62]

Template:Blockquote

Adena K. Berkowitz, in her application to argue before the United States Supreme Court, opted to use BCE and CE because, "Given the multicultural society that we live in, the traditional Jewish designations—B.C.E. and C.E.—cast a wider net of inclusion."[63] In the World History Encyclopedia, Joshua J. Mark wrote "Non-Christian scholars, especially, embraced [CE and BCE] because they could now communicate more easily with the Christian community. Jewish, Islamic, Hindu and Buddhist scholars could retain their [own] calendar but refer to events using the Gregorian Calendar as BCE and CE without compromising their own beliefs about the divinity of Jesus of Nazareth."[64] In History Today, Michael Ostling wrote: "BC/AD Dating: In the year of whose Lord? The continuing use of AD and BC is not only factually wrong but also offensive to many who are not Christians."[60]

Opposition

Critics note that there is no difference in the epoch of the two systems—both chosen to be close to the date of birth of Jesus. Since the year numbers are the same, the use of BCE and CE dates should be equally offensive to adherents of religions other than Christianity as the use of BC and AD dates.[65] Roman Catholic priest and writer on interfaith issues Raimon Panikkar argued that the BCE/CE usage is the less inclusive option since the notation still uses the Christian calendar numbers, forcing it on non-Christian nations and individuals.[66] In 1993, the English-language expert Kenneth G. Wilson speculated a slippery slope scenario in his style guide: "If we do end by casting aside the AD/BC convention, almost certainly some will argue that we ought to cast aside as well the conventional numbering system [that is, the method of numbering years] itself, given its Christian basis."[67]

Conventions in style guides

The abbreviation BCE, just as with BC, always follows the year number. Unlike AD, which still often precedes the year number, CE always follows the year number (if context requires that it be written at all).[68] Thus, the current year is written as 2026 in both notations (or, if further clarity is needed, as 2026 CE, or as AD 2026), and the year that Socrates died is represented as 399 BCE (the same year that 399 BC represents in the BC/AD notation). The abbreviations are sometimes written with small capital letters (e.g., "BCE") or with periods (e.g., "C.E.").[69]

Similar conventions in other languages

See also

Template:Portal

Explanatory notes

Template:Notelist

References

Template:Reflist

Template:Wiktionary

Template:External media Template:Calendars Template:Time Topics Template:Chronology

  1. Template:Cite encyclopedia
  2. Template:Cite web
  3. Template:Cite web
  4. Template:Cite news
  5. Template:Cite dictionary
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Pedersen
  7. Doggett, L.E., (1992), "Calendars" in Seidelmann, P.K., The Explanatory Supplement to the Astronomical Almanac, Sausalito CA: University Science Books, 2.1
  8. Template:Cite book
  9. Template:Cite encyclopedia Template:Grove Music subscription
  10. Template:Cite web
  11. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named VulgarisAerae1
  12. Template:Cite web
  13. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named OED vulgar
  14. Template:Cite book
  15. Template:Cite book (His third use of "vulgaris aerae" (1617))
  16. Template:Cite book
  17. Template:Cite book
  18. Template:Cite web
  19. Template:Cite book (Possibly the first use of common era in English (1708))
  20. Template:Cite book Before Christ and Christian Era appear on the same page 252, while Vulgar Era appears on page 250
  21. Template:Cite book [In this case, their refers to the Jews.]
  22. Template:Cite book [Possibly the first English use of "before the common era", with "vulgar era" synonymous with "common era" (1770)]
  23. Template:Cite encyclopedia
  24. Template:Cite encyclopedia
  25. Template:Cite book
  26. Template:Cite book
  27. Template:Cite Encyclopedia.
  28. Template:Cite encyclopedia
  29. Template:Cite book
  30. Template:Cite book
  31. Template:Cite book
  32. Template:Cite book
  33. Template:Cite book
  34. Template:Cite book
  35. Template:Cite book
  36. Template:Cite book
  37. Template:Cite web
  38. Template:Cite web [19 Sivan 5585 AM is 5 June 1825. VE is likely an abbreviation for Vulgar Era.]
  39. 39.0 39.1 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Gormley
  40. Template:Cite web
  41. See, for example, the Society for Historical Archaeology states in its more recent style guide "Do not use CE (common era), BP (before present), or BCE; convert these expressions to AD and BC." (In section I 5 the Society explains how to use "years BP" in connection with radiocarbon ages.) Template:Cite web whereas the American Anthropological Association style guide takes a different approach, supporting the use of "CE" and "BCE." Template:Cite web
  42. Template:Cite journal
  43. Template:Cite news
  44. Template:Cite news
  45. "Museum of Civilization putting the 'Christ' back in history as BC and AD return", by Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press, National Post, 27 February 2013
  46. Template:Cite news
  47. 47.0 47.1 47.2 "National Trust tells properties to stop dropping BC and AD out of fear it might offend non-Christians", The Daily Telegraph, by Henry Bodkin, 12 November 2018
  48. Stonehenge glossary, "BC and AD" English Heritage
  49. Template:Cite web
  50. Template:Cite web
  51. Template:Cite web
  52. Template:Cite web;Template:Cite web
  53. Template:Cite web
  54. SBL Handbook of Style Society of Biblical Literature 1999 "8.1.2 ERAS – The preferred style is B.C.E. and C.E. (with periods). If you use A.D. and B.C., remember that A.D. precedes the date and B.C. follows it. (For the use of these abbreviations in titles, see § 7.1.3.2.)"
  55. Template:Cite web
  56. Template:Cite news
  57. Template:Cite web
  58. Template:Cite book
  59. Template:Cite book
  60. 60.0 60.1 Template:Cite magazine
  61. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named RelTolrnc
  62. Template:Cite news
  63. Template:Cite news
  64. Template:Cite Encyclopedia
  65. Template:Cite web
  66. Template:Cite book
  67. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Wilson
  68. Template:Cite book
  69. Template:Cite web
  70. 70.0 70.1 Template:Cite magazine
  71. Template:Lang (19 May 1838). See page 175 in Allgemeine Zeitung des Judenthums: Ein unpartheiisches Organ für alles jüdische Interesse in Betreff von Politik, Religion, Literatur, Geschichte, Sprachkunde und Belletristik, Volume 2 (Leipzig 1838).
  72. Template:Aut, Template:Lang (Leipzig 1862–1869).
  73. Template:Cite web
  74. Template:Cite book
  75. Template:Cite web
  76. Template:Cite web
  77. Template:Cite web
  78. Template:Cite web
  79. Template:Cite web
  80. Template:Cite web